G12 — Reputation, review, and corroboration graph · Graph systems

182 words. Researched design, reviewed 2026-09-12: a library view or proposed design with its sources stated; not a deployed system, a live audit or a provider requirement. Source: Graph/G12-reputation-review-and-corroboration-graph.md. Graph systems, shelf 5 of 8; library release 2026.09.12-g40.

Status: NEW RESEARCHED DESIGN; not deployed
Reviewed: 2026-09-12
Nature: library analytical view
Priority: P1
Accountability: R19, R14, R11, R18

Question

Who said what about which entity, with what provenance and independence?

Nodes

Reviewer; Review; Reviewed entity; Publisher; Disclosure; Source owner

Relationship sketch

review → exact subject
statement → publisher
publisher → ownership/disclosure record

Evidence inputs

Actual reviews and dates, subject matching, publication rights, disclosed sponsorship, source lineage.

Implementation

Preserve review context and scales. Record whether a source is owned, paid, syndicated, or independently earned; never infer independence from different domain names alone.

Acceptance checks

Review subject is not confused with another product/business
Syndicated copies share a provenance origin
Feature eligibility is checked separately from review authenticity

Do not infer

Authentic self-hosted testimonials do not automatically qualify for LocalBusiness/Organization review stars.

Publication boundary

Approved review evidence public; unnecessary reviewer data excluded.

Source basis

S29, S14, S43. See Research/sources.json. Sources support the primitives or named technology. The organization, labels, actions, and acceptance contracts in this catalog are this library's design, not claimed provider requirements.